Seven service lines.
One managed partnership.

Most Nigerian SME owners think of financial reports as something you produce when someone asks for them. A bank requests three years of accounts. A grant programme requires audited financials. An investor wants to see a financial model. The report is then assembled urgently, from records that were not maintained with reporting in mind, and the scramble itself reveals the problem. Reports produced reactively for external parties are not management tools. They are compliance documents assembled under pressure, frequently from records that are incomplete, unreconciled, or structured in ways that produce totals but no insight.

The result is a business running on aggregate numbers that answer none of the questions that actually drive strategic decisions. Revenue is ₦50M, but which product line generated it? Which customer drove it? Which location was profitable and which consumed margin without return? Which project delivered a positive return and which destroyed cash quietly? What is the revenue concentration risk, does one customer account for 40% of income, creating a commercial vulnerability that appears nowhere in a standard P&L? What is the cost structure, which costs are fixed, which are variable, and where is cost creep happening that the aggregate expense line conceals?

The institutional dimension is equally critical. Every bank, DFI, equity investor, development partner, strategic collaborator, and institutional stakeholder requires both management accounts and audited financial statements as inputs to their assessment, and not interchangeably. Management accounts establish the current trading position and recent performance trend. Audited financial statements validate the historical record and establish institutional credibility. Financial models and funding applications draw their assumptions, projections, and risk analysis from both. A financial model built on aggregate, unverified totals is unverifiable by any sophisticated counterparty, it will be identified as such and the engagement will stall. The quality of every financial model, business plan, and strategic growth projection is entirely determined by the quality of the underlying financial record it is built on.

SME360 runs your complete fiscal function as an embedded, professional, ongoing service, not a periodic accountant visit. The deliverable is not a set of accounts. It is operational financial intelligence, produced on a defined schedule, that allows management to run the business on evidence and engage any institutional counterparty with confidence.

Most businesses that "have QuickBooks", or Sage, Zoho Books, Odoo, or any ERP, are using a fraction of its capability: basic income and expense recording with no structure, no reporting hierarchy, and no connection to the management decisions that matter. The platform is almost irrelevant. The configuration is everything. The chart of accounts is misconfigured. Class tracking is not enabled, so profitability by product, location, or division is impossible to extract. Projects are not costed, so job profitability is invisible. Bank feeds are unreconciled. The result is a system that produces an aggregate P&L and nothing more, and that aggregate P&L cannot answer any of the questions that drive real management decisions.

The financial infrastructure configuration is not a technical exercise. It is the architecture that determines what management intelligence can be produced, and therefore what decisions can be made on data rather than instinct. A properly configured financial system with class tracking, location tracking, and project costing enabled produces the segment-level profitability analysis, concentration risk visibility, and cash flow intelligence that management reporting requires. A poorly configured one produces totals. SME360 configures, manages, and where necessary rescues cloud accounting environments as a professional service. The software is a tool. The financial intelligence it enables is the deliverable.

Structure precedes everything. The reality of the Nigerian SME landscape is this: a significant number of businesses are not registered at all, operating informally, transacting through the owner's personal bank account, with no legal entity, no separation between personal and business liability, and no institutional identity. A second group is incorporated, but incorrectly, wrong entity type for the ownership structure, shareholding arrangements that do not reflect actual beneficial ownership, missing MEMAT and Articles, or post-incorporation documentation never completed after registration. A third group is structurally sound on paper but has never maintained their documentation, annual returns unfiled, directors not formally updated, share registers non-existent. In all three cases, the exposure is the same: tax liability, investor barriers, governance vulnerabilities, and a legal foundation that collapses the moment a bank, DFI, or institutional partner looks closely. SME360 builds and maintains your legal foundation as a professional, ongoing service, starting from wherever you actually are.

Most Nigerian SME owners think of statutory compliance as a cost, something to manage, minimise, and deal with when it becomes urgent. That framing is expensive. Statutory compliance is a strategic asset. It is the baseline qualification for every institutional opportunity a business will ever pursue, and its absence is a silent disqualifier that most businesses never see coming. There is a second, less visible dimension of compliance risk that most Nigerian business owners are entirely unaware of. The EFCC's SCUML framework designates a broad category of businesses as Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions, DNFBPs, that are legally required to register and file returns regardless of whether they handle client funds. The scope is broader than most business owners realise. Real estate businesses, law firms, accounting and audit practices, management consultants, hotels and hospitality operators, car dealers, supermarkets, construction companies, mechanised farming operations, betting and gaming businesses, dealers in luxury goods and precious metals, and many others. NGOs form a distinct class within the framework, required to register regardless of profit status. The list extends further still: the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022 empowers the Minister of Trade and Investment to designate additional categories at any time. If your business handles significant cash transactions or operates in a sector with high-value client dealings, the question is not whether SCUML applies to you in principle, it is whether anyone has ever told you. Most of these businesses have never been told they are within scope. Many registered once and never filed the required ongoing returns and reports. When the EFCC comes knocking, the response is almost always the same: “We are not into anything illegal.” That is almost certainly true, and entirely irrelevant. SCUML non-compliance is a structural violation, not a moral one. The EFCC does not need to prove wrongdoing. It needs to prove that you were required to register and did not. SME360 identifies your SCUML obligations, registers your business correctly, and manages your timely filings of relevant returns and reports as and when due, or advises and guides your team, as a permanent ongoing function. Before the letter arrives, not after. Consider what poor compliance actually costs. A DFI funding programme requires clean SCUML and valid TCC: a non-compliant business is removed from eligibility before its application is reviewed, not rejected on merit, but eliminated on qualification. A commercial bank credit facility requires SCUML and TCC as documentary prerequisites: without them, the application cannot be submitted. A government contract or public procurement award requires PENCOM compliance certificates and TCC as mandatory submission documents: non-compliance means automatic disqualification. A development partner or corporate grant programme runs compliance checks as a first filter: a business with lapsed filings does not get to the assessment stage. A prospective equity investor reviews compliance as part of initial due diligence: accumulated lapses signal operational indiscipline regardless of revenue performance. Strategic business partners, collaborators, and joint venture counterparts increasingly run compliance checks before formalising any working relationship, a non-compliant business is quietly removed from consideration before a conversation begins. And none of this includes the direct costs, NRS (formerly FIRS) penalties and interest compounding on unfiled returns, PENCOM and NSITF surcharges accumulating on unremitted contributions, CAC debts accumulating on unmanaged annual returns, CBN-directed account restrictions on businesses that have not fulfilled their SCUML reporting obligations. SME360 owns your entire regulatory calendar, proactively, ahead of every deadline, as a managed ongoing function. Not reactive. Not urgent. Continuously managed.

If the business stops when the CEO travels, you don't have a company, you have a founder with employees.

Most SMEs hit an invisible ceiling when the founder's knowledge and judgment can no longer be replicated or delegated. No documented processes. No internal controls. Financial decisions made informally. Fraud risk rising quietly. Every time a key person leaves, institutional knowledge walks out with them. SME360 designs and implements the frameworks that change this permanently.

SME360 collaborates with DFIs, NGOs, government agencies, and corporate foundations as a credible technical partner, deploying the complete infrastructure stack from business registration and structural enablement through governance, compliance management, financial systems, and capacity building that transforms SME beneficiaries into bankable, transparent, and scalable enterprises. Most programmes begin mid-sequence, after registration, assuming structure. SME360 starts at the foundation and builds through. We do not advise from a distance. We deliver, embedded in the programme, accountable for results.